Chicago Bulls — 2026 Offseason Report
Strategic Framework · Post-AKME Era · April 2026

Chicago Bulls
2026 Offseason Report

By Armaan Sharma

The firing of Artūras Karnišovas and Marc Eversley ended six years of institutional drift. What the Bulls do next will define the franchise for the better part of a decade.

30–52
2025–26 record
–3.6
Net rating (22nd)
$74.6M
Available cap space
224–254
AKME era record
01

The AKME Era — A Decision-by-Decision Autopsy

Under Artūras Karnišovas and Marc Eversley, the Bulls went 224–254 over six seasons, making the playoffs just once — a five-game first-round exit to Milwaukee in 2021–22. The team hovered in no-man’s land: never good enough to contend, never bad enough to secure the draft positioning that could fundamentally change the franchise. On April 6, 2026, Bulls CEO Michael Reinsdorf dismissed both with four games remaining in the season.

Seasons
6
2020–21 through 2025–26
Playoff appearances
1
R1 exit vs. Milwaukee, 2022
Best season record
46–36
2021–22 behind DeRozan + LaVine
Final season record
30–52
23rd in both ORtg and DRtg
Key decisions that defined the era
The Vučević Trade (2021)
Asset mismanagement
Surrendered Wendell Carter Jr., Otto Porter Jr., and two first-round picks — which became Franz Wagner and Jett Howard — for Vučević. The Bulls also absorbed Al-Farouq Aminu’s contract, which then forced the inclusion of Thad Young as salary filler in the DeRozan trade. The Spurs flipped Young for a first-round pick. Assets converting to liabilities at every step.
Gafford and Markkanen — Sold at the Bottom
Asset mismanagement
Daniel Gafford — a high-motor rim protector with All-Defense upside — was dealt for essentially Javonte Green. Lauri Markkanen, now an All-Star in Utah, was moved for Derrick Jones Jr. and a pick that still has not conveyed. Both were bottom-of-market sells on players whose value only increased.
Patrick Williams — #4 Pick, Then the Extension
Draft + extension misstep
Selecting Williams with the 4th overall pick in 2020 was a reach for a one-and-done freshman averaging 9.2 points in limited minutes. Locking him into a 5-year, $90M extension before he demonstrated requisite production turned a correctable mistake into a multi-year structural problem.
The Caruso–Giddey Trade
Defensible, but costly
Giddey was at a reputational nadir when the deal was made, which made it defensible in isolation. But Caruso was a top-15 perimeter defender who went on to contribute to a championship in OKC. A more aggressive front office extracts draft capital rather than accepting a straight swap.
Moving on from the Core Too Late
Timing failure
The most damaging pattern of the era. By the time Karnišovas committed to pivoting away from the LaVine–DeRozan–Vučević window, the value that core could generate had collapsed. The team was left with neither contention nor a clear rebuild path — the definition of being trapped.
02

Team Context — Cap Architecture & On-Court Profile

Chicago’s financial position is the central fact of this offseason. Their committed salary is concentrated in a handful of players, giving the organization more flexibility to reshape its roster in a single summer than nearly any franchise in the league — and crucially, they sit $131.6M below the second apron, preserving every CBA tool available.

$68.5M
Fully guaranteed
5 players locked in
~$90.4M
Committed incl. options
Team options likely exercised
~$74.6M
Available cap space
vs. $165M cap
$131.6M
Below 2nd apron
Apron at $222M
Committed contracts — 2026–27
Josh Giddey
$25.0M
GTD · yr 2 of 4
Patrick Williams
$18.0M
GTD · yr 3 of 5
Isaac Okoro
$11.8M
GTD · yr 3 of 3
Jalen Smith
$9.4M
Team option
Tre Jones
$8.0M
GTD · yr 2 of 3
Matas Buzelis
$5.7M
T-opt exercised
Noa Essengue
$5.7M
GTD · yr 2 of 4
Advanced statistical profile — 2025–26
Offensive rating
114.3
20th of 30
Defensive rating
117.9
21st of 30
Net rating
–3.6
22nd of 30
Pace (possessions/48 min)
2nd in NBA ✓ 102.0
True shooting % (TS%)
22nd — below avg 56.1%
3-point attempt rate (3PAr)
16th — average 36.3%
Turnover rate (TOV%) — lower is better
8th — elite ✓ 12.2%
Key takeaway: Chicago is elite in pace (2nd) and ball security (8th in TOV%) — and below average in every efficiency metric. The gap between what they generate and what they convert is the central roster problem. OKC’s superior TS%, three-point volume, and defensive rating all stem from having a rim-protecting center and two-way wings — Chicago’s precise areas of need.
03

Strategic Framework

Does Billy Donovan stay?
Retain
Donovan’s up-tempo system is well-suited to Giddey and Buzelis, his communication with young players is strong, and Reinsdorf has been emphatic about his support. The basketball case for retention is real. The condition must be alignment — if the new GM’s vision is incompatible with Donovan’s system, that conversation needs to happen before contracts are signed.
Compete or rebuild?
Competitive rebuild
The Bulls should not tank. Ownership won’t support it, the proposed lottery reform removes the mathematical incentive, and the young core benefits from competitive development. Target a 35–45 win range — good enough to develop meaningful habits, positioned well in the lottery for what projects to be a strong 2027 class.
On lottery reform: A Board of Governors vote on May 28, 2026 would expand the lottery to 18 teams and give the bottom 10 non-playoff teams identical 8% odds at the No. 1 pick. If passed, the incremental benefit of finishing with the worst record disappears entirely — structurally validating a “competitive rebuild” approach for franchises like Chicago.
Summary — what the team needs
#1 Critical
Rim Protector
A legitimate shot deterrent to anchor the defense and serve as a lob target in transition. The single highest-leverage addition this roster can make.
#2 Critical
Shot-Creating Wing
A secondary initiator who can generate quality looks independently from Giddey. The offense has no counterpunch when he struggles.
#3 High
Three-Point Volume & Efficiency
Floor spacing is a structural necessity at Chicago’s pace. Poor spacing negates the transition advantage entirely.
#4 High
On-Ball Perimeter Defense
At least one high-level individual defender to transform the defensive ceiling and cover Giddey’s documented limitations.
04

Roster Decisions

Tre Jones
Shop aggressively
The Bulls are guard-heavy and Jones has no meaningful future here. A solid backup distributor who has real value to contenders. Target second-round picks or future draft considerations.
Leonard Miller
Decline + re-sign
Decline his team option, then immediately engage on a long-term deal (3–4 years, $8–10M/yr). Genuine two-way versatility flashes at 22. Cost-controlled development piece — exactly the player-efficient deal the prior FO was unable to execute.
Collin Sexton
Right terms only
Averaged 19.9 pts, 3.9 reb, 3.0 ast over his last 9 as a Bull. Worth retaining at $10–13M/yr on 2–3 years. If market drives him above that, let him walk. Do not compromise cap flexibility for a 5th or 6th option.
Young core — the building blocks
Matas Buzelis
PF · Age 21 · $5.7M
41-point breakout performance, consistent two-way flashes. Option exercised immediately — clearest organizational signal of confidence. Best cap situation on the roster.
Josh Giddey
PG · Age 22 · $25M
14.6 pts, 8.1 reb, 7.2 ast on career-best splits (46.5/37.8/78.1). Near triple-double threat, but below-average defender. At $25M on a rising cap, not an albatross — but the FO must build around his profile with eyes open.
Noa Essengue
SF · Age 19 · $5.7M
12th overall pick in 2025. Missed most of this season due to injury, which complicates evaluation but does not diminish long-term profile. Team-friendly terms through end of the decade.
05

Free Agency Targets

Priority #1 — Center: The most critical acquisition analytically, structurally, and competitively. Without a rim protector, the defensive identity of this team cannot improve regardless of what else is added.
Isaiah Hartenstein
OKC Thunder · UFA (if club option declined)
Priority A
11.2
PPG
10.4
RPG
64.4%
FG%
Thunder are projected $50M+ over the second apron — Hartenstein’s $28.5M club option is almost certain to be declined. If he hits the market, he is the most impactful center available. Bulls should be at the front of that line at $28–32M/yr.
Projected contract 4yr / $120–130M
Walker Kessler
Utah Jazz · Restricted free agent
Priority A
12.2
RPG
3.4
BLK/36
24
Age
Missed most of 2025–26 with a torn labrum, but his production — 13.5 pts, 13.2 reb, 3.4 blk per 36 — speaks for itself. Jazz far apart on extension price. Chicago’s cap space forces Utah into a matching decision they may be unable to make. Injury risk is real but age and ceiling make him the most exciting option if Hartenstein isn’t available.
Projected contract 4yr / $100–120M
Priority #2 — Shot-Creating Wing: A versatile wing who can defend multiple positions, shoot from three, and create independently. The profile most in demand across the league.
Peyton Watson
Denver Nuggets · Restricted free agent
Priority B
14.6
PPG
41.7%
3P%
1.0+
STL+BLK
Breakout season — one of few players averaging 1+ stl and 1+ blk at 6’8″. Denver is over $215M committed. A 4-year, $100M offer sheet forces them into a choice they may be unable to make. Two-way impact at this size is exactly Chicago’s need.
Projected contract 4yr / $95–105M
Tari Eason
Houston Rockets · Restricted free agent
Priority B
10.5
PPG
2.1
OREB
~2.0
STL+BLK
Motor-and-hustle wing with elite defensive instincts. Offensive rebounding rate creates extra possessions few wings can match. Houston over first apron — $18–22M/yr for 4 years tests their willingness to commit at full price. Injury history (85 games missed over two seasons) is the real concern. Lower cost than Watson.
Projected contract 4yr / $70–85M
06

Taking on Unwanted Contracts — Draft Capital Play

There is a third avenue of roster construction the Bulls are uniquely positioned to execute: using their surplus cap space as currency to absorb bloated contracts from distressed teams, extracting first-round draft picks in return. With $111.5M in available space, Chicago is the most attractive landing spot for those conversations in the league.

The historical blueprint: Sam Presti wrote this playbook during OKC’s 2020–23 rebuild — taking on Al Horford’s contract from Philadelphia, receiving a first-round pick in return, then repeating the strategy systematically. Presti’s insight was simple: cap space is an asset and should be treated like one. The Bulls have never operated this way. Notably, it is Presti’s Thunder who now find themselves on the other side of the table.
Teams that will be making calls
OKC Thunder
~$28M+ over 2nd apron
Supermax extensions for Williams + Holmgren (SGA kicks in 2027–28). Need to move salary this summer. Most logical trade partner.
Denver Nuggets
$215M+ committed
Jokic ~$60M, Murray ~$50M, Braun’s new 5-year extension on the books. Enormous financial pressure to shed salary wherever possible.
Sacramento + Others
Over both aprons
Sacramento in financial disarray. Minnesota and Cleveland in uncomfortable proximity to apron thresholds. All will be making calls.
The framework — how to execute it right
1
Contract length is the most critical variable. Aggressive on 1–2 year absorptions. Disciplined to the point of refusal on anything 4–5 years. Patrick Williams is already one cautionary tale on this roster.
2
Pick quality must be commensurate. The floor should be an unprotected or lightly protected first from a team still expected to compete. A late first from OKC or Denver in 2028–29 has real value. Heavily protected picks dilute the transaction to irrelevance.
3
The opportunity cost is essentially zero. The Bulls must reach the $147M salary floor regardless. Taking on a $20–25M two-year contract while receiving a first-round pick is filling a roster spot they were already obligated to fill — and getting paid a draft asset to do it.
07

The 2026 Draft

The 2026 draft is widely regarded as one of the deepest in recent memory. The consensus top tier — AJ Dybantsa (BYU), Darryn Peterson (Kansas), and Cameron Boozer (Duke) — represents legitimate franchise-altering talent. Chicago holds the 9th pick at 4.5% odds at No. 1, plus Portland’s first (if 15–30), and their own picks through 2031.

Top prospects — 2026 class
Consensus #1
AJ Dybantsa
BYU · Franchise-altering wing talent. The clear consensus top prospect heading into the lottery.
Consensus #2
Darryn Peterson
Kansas · Elite guard prospect with two-way upside. Top-tier by any evaluation framework.
Consensus #3
Cameron Boozer
Duke · High-floor big with offensive versatility. Legitimate franchise piece at the right spot.
Scenario planning
Top 4 pick
Stay put. Any of the top prospects would be transformative alongside Buzelis. Draft the player who best fits the new FO’s development philosophy — do not force a fit with Giddey. The player will define the roster, not the other way around.
Pick 9, one pick
Draft best available. This class has legitimate talent through the mid-lottery. If a compelling opportunity to move up to the top 4 presents itself at a cost-efficient price, explore it — but do not force a trade up at the cost of next year’s pick or significant future capital.
Pick 9 + Portland (15–20)
Most interesting scenario. Default is to draft both — a 17th or 18th pick has genuine developmental value in this class. However, packaging both to move up to 2–4 is a conversation worth having. Two mid-lottery picks for a top-4 selection could be a net talent gain. Make the calls, but default to drafting both if the price is steep.
Core draft philosophy: Take the best available player at every selection, without regard to positional need. This is a team that lacks talent first and specific positions second. The instinct to draft for need — “we need a center, so we’ll take the best available center even if a superior wing is on the board” — is the kind of logic that costs teams decades. Free agency and trades address positional need. The draft is for acquiring talent.
08

Conclusion

The path from here is clear
What the new front office must get right to avoid repeating the same cycle
01
Hire a front office president with the authority to make bold decisions
The organizational structure must give the new GM full authority over roster construction. Donovan as a meaningful voice, not the decision-maker. Alignment before contracts are signed.
02
Prioritize a rim protector above all else in free agency
Hartenstein if OKC declines his option. Kessler as the preferred realistic target. Do not overpay for inferior options out of desperation — patience here is a virtue.
03
Add a two-way wing creator — Watson or Eason
Chicago’s cap space puts them in a unique position to pursue both restricted free agents and force their incumbent teams into uncomfortable matching decisions. Watson is the preferred target.
04
Use cap space as currency to accumulate draft capital
Short-term contract absorptions from distressed second-apron teams in exchange for unprotected first-round picks. The Bulls must reach the salary floor anyway — get paid assets to do it.
05
Draft best available talent — never for positional need
In a class this deep, the right move at every slot is the player with the highest ceiling and floor combination. Free agency and trades address fit. The draft is too precious a resource to waste on roster engineering.
Chicago Bulls — 2026 Offseason Report · By Armaan Sharma April 2026 · For distribution